3.1CGIplus Programming |
3.2Code Examples |
3.3Other Considerations |
↩︎ | ↖︎ | ↑︎ | ↘︎ | ↪︎ |
Common Gateway Interface | … | plus lower latency, |
---|---|---|
plus greater throughput, | ||
plus far less system impact! |
I know, I know! The term CGIplus is a bit too cute but I had to call it something!
CGIplus attempts to eliminate the overhead associated with creating the script process and then executing the image of a CGI script. It does this by allowing the script process and any associated image/application to continue executing between uses, eliminating startup overheads. This reduces both the load on the system and the request latency. In this sense these advantages parallel those offered by commercial HTTP server-integration APIs, such as Netscape NSAPI and Microsoft ISAPI, without the disadvantages of such proprietory interfaces, the API complexity, language dependency and server process integration.
Existing CGI scripts can rapidly and elegantly be modified to additionally support CGIplus. The capability of scripts to easily differentiate between and operate in both standard CGI and CGIplus environments with a minimum of code revision offers great versatility. Many WASD scripts operate in both environments.
A simple performance evaluation indicates the advantage of CGIplus. See "Techncial Overview, Performance" for some test results comparing the CGI and CGIplus environments.
Without a doubt, the subjective difference in activating the same script within the standard CGI and CGIplus environments is quite startling!
The script interface is still CGI, with all the usual environment variables and input/output streams available, which means a new API does not need to be learned and existing CGI scripts are simple to modify.
See examples in WASD_ROOT:[SRC.CGIPLUS]
Instead of having the CGI variables available from the environment (generally accessed via the C Language getenv() standard library call, or via DCL symbols) a CGIplus script must read the CGI variables from an I/O stream named CGIPLUSIN. The variables can be supplied in one of two modes.
This default and simple record-oriented mode allows any environment that can read records from an input source to process CGIplus variables. This of course includes DCL (examples referenced below).
This mode offers significantly lower system overheads and improves latency and performance at the cost of the additional complexity of recovering the variables from a binary structure. Code examples and CGILIB functions make this relatively trivial at the application level.
After processing, the CGIplus script can loop, waiting to read the details of the next request from CGIPLUSIN.
Request output (to the client) is written to SYS$OUTPUT (<stdout>) as per normal CGI behaviour. End of output MUST be indicated by writing a special EOF record to the output stream. A unique EOF sequence is generated for each use of DCL via a zombie or CGIplus script process. A non-repeating series of bits most unlikely to occur in normal output is employed … but there is still a very, very, very small chance of premature termination of output (one in 2^224 I think!) See WASD_ROOT:[SRC.HTTPD]CGI.C for how the value is generated.
The CGIplus EOF string is obtained by the script from the logical name CGIPLUSEOF, defined in the script process' process table, using the scripting language's equivalent of F$TRNLNM(), SYS$TRNLNM(), or a getenv() call (in the C standard library). This string will always contain less than 64 characters and comprise only printable characters. It must be written at the conclusion of a request's output to the output stream as a single record (line) but may also contain a <CR><LF> or just <LF> trailing carriage-control (to allow for programming language requirements). It only has to be evaluated once, as the processing begins, remaining the same for all requests over the life-time of that instance of the script.
HTTP input (raw request body stream) is still available to a CGIplus script.
A source code collection of C language functions useful for processing the more vexing aspects of CGI/CGIplus/RTE programming (1.12 Scripting Function Library).
Of course a CGIplus script should only have a single exit point and should explicitly close files, free allocated memory, etc., after processing a request (i.e. not rely on image run-down to clean-up after itself). It is particularly important when modifying existing scripts to work in the CGIplus environment to ensure this requirement is met (who of us hasn't thought "well, this file will close when the image exits anyway"?)
It is a simple task to design a script to modify its behaviour according to the environment it is executing in. Detecting the presence or absence of the CGIPLUSEOF logical is sufficient indication. The following C code fragment shows simultaneously determining whether it is a standard or CGIplus environment (and setting an appropriate boolean), and getting the CGIplus EOF sequence (if it exists).
The following C code fragment shows a basic CGIplus record-mode request loop, reading lines from CGIPLUSIN, and some basic processing to select required CGI variables for request processing. Generally this level of coding is not required as it is recommended to employ the functionality of something like the CGILIB functiona library.
This mode requires significantly more code than record-mode. A self-contained C language function, allowing CGI variable processing in standard CGI, CGIplus record-mode and CGIplus struct-mode, is available for inclusion in user applications. It automatically detects the environment and changes behaviour to suit. This or CGILIB is strongly recommended.
See source in WASD_ROOT:[SRC.CGIPLUS]CGIPLUS_CGIVAR.C
CGI scripts can write output in record (line-by-line) or binary mode (more efficient because of buffering by the C RTL). When in binary mode the output stream must be flushed immediately before and after writing the CGIplus EOF sequence (note that in binary a full HTTP stream must also be used). This code fragment shows placing a script output stream into binary mode and the flushing steps.
See examples in WASD_ROOT:[SRC.CGIPLUS]
Scripting processes may be purged or deleted using (see HTTPd Command Line in WASD Features).
Multiple CGIplus scripts may be executing in multiple processes at any one time. This includes multiple instances of any particular script. It is the server's task to track these, distributing appropriate requests to idle processes, monitoring those currently processing requests, creating new instances if and when necessary, and deleting the least-used, idle CGIplus processes when configurable thresholds are reached. Of course it is the script's job to maintain coherency if multiple instances may result in resource conflicts or race conditions, etc., between the scripts.
The CGIplus script process can be given a finite life-time set by configuration parameter (see "Features and Facilities, Server Configuration"). If this life-time is not set then the CGIplus will persist indefinitely (i.e. until purged due to soft-limits being reached, or explicitly purged/deleted). When a life-time has been set the CGIplus process is automatically deleted after being idle for the specified period (i.e. not having processed a request). This can be useful in preventing sporadically used scripts from cluttering up the system indefinitely.
In addition, an idle CGIplus script can be run-down by the server at any time the script process soft-limit is reached, so resources should be largely quiescent when not actually processing (1.2.6 Script Process Run-Down). Of course, in extreme situations, a CGIplus process may also be manually terminated from the command line (e.g. STOP/ID=).
Some CGIplus scripting information and management is available via the server administration menu, see "Features and Facilities, Server Reports".
CGIplus scripts are differentiated from standard CGI scripts in the mapping rule configuration file using the "script+" and "exec+" directives (see Request Processing Configuration in WASD Configuration).
Scripts capable of operating in both standard CGI and CGIplus environments may simply be accessed in either via rules such as
↩︎ | ↖︎ | ↑︎ | ↘︎ | ↪︎ |